Legal Opinion

Von Holt v. Williamson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1916No. 903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motions for Allowance of Attorneys’ Fees.

1Per curiam

In the decision in this case (ante p. 201) we held that the income arising from the trust estate created by the will of the testator Rhodes constitutes a resulting trust, by operation of law, in favor of Ada Tree Rhodes Williamson, the daughter of said testator, and that she is entitled to the whole of the said income as against her infant daughter, the residuary beneficiary. The attorneys for Mrs. Williamson now move the court to allow them a reasonable fee for their services rendered in this case, the same to be paid out of the principal of the trust estate. The attorneys for Ellen Tree…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gott v. CookNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  3. Lee v. Vacuum Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Lowry v. . Farmers' Loan Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Wood v. VandenburghNew York Court of Chancery · 1837

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. CadinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Welsh v. CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bishop Trust Co. v. Cooke Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API