Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Bowen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1925No. 4263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

The first and second paragraphs of appellants’ brief filed in this court contain a comprehensive statement of the issues tried in the court below. The paragraphs referred to read as follows:

“This is an action hy plaintiffs against defendants ■ for contribution on a certain alleged guaranty contract, Exhibit A, signed by plaintiffs and defendants as second parties, and Ellison-White Chautauqua Association as first party. By the terms of said contract the second parties agreed to buy and pay for 725 season tickets at $2.75 each for Chautauqua to he held in Logan in the summer of 1923. It is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Katz v. PreteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Mawhinney v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hanson v. Mutual Finance Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API