Skulimowski v. Deahl
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Duput, Judge, presiding. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Brown
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appliance or machine by the working or motion of which the plaintiff received the injury that is the occasion of this suit, is a common and necessary part of laundry machinery and is known as a “wringer” as well as an “extractor,” because it does the work of the older device of a wringing machine in drying or at least removing water from the washed clothes. It is a machine the outer part of which resembles a large bowl made of iron. It is attached to the floor by iron supports. This bowl above the supports is about 24 or 25…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DunleavyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Krieger v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. HarringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. LawlorIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hazelrigg Trucking Co. v. DuvallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Hazelrigg Trucking Co. v. DuvallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953