Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kretsch v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1984No. Appeal, No. 1510 C.D. 1982Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Colins:

I must respectfully dissent.

I believe that the majority’s conclusion that the claimant’s duties as a laboratory technician included snow shoveling is unsupported by substantial evidence.

There was nothing in the claimant’s job description requiring him to shovel snow.1 Certainly, it was *175totally unrelated to his primary duties as a lab technician, which also included some computer programming.

Although it is reasonable for a lab technician to be required to keep the laboratory and equipment clean, I do not agree that it is reasonable to require that the claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Brennan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Howard v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API