Kretsch v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Colins:
I must respectfully dissent.
I believe that the majority’s conclusion that the claimant’s duties as a laboratory technician included snow shoveling is unsupported by substantial evidence.
There was nothing in the claimant’s job description requiring him to shovel snow.1 Certainly, it was *175totally unrelated to his primary duties as a lab technician, which also included some computer programming.
Although it is reasonable for a lab technician to be required to keep the laboratory and equipment clean, I do not agree that it is reasonable to require that the claimant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Brennan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Howard v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977