Wirsing v. Pennsylvania Hotel & Sanitarium Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 151, Oct. T., 1909, by The Southside Trust Company of Pittsburg, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Pulaski Springs Hotel Company, Successor in Title to the Pennsylvania Hotel & Sanitarium Company, Owner, from order of C. P. Lawrence Co., Sept. T., 1908, No. 13, dismissing petition to limit and define curtilage in case of Harry M. Wirsing v. Pennsylvania Hotel & Sanitarium Company, Owner or Reputed Owner. Petition to limit and define curtilage.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 151, Oct. T., 1909, by The Southside Trust Company of Pittsburg, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Pulaski Springs Hotel Company, Successor in Title to the Pennsylvania Hotel & Sanitarium Company, Owner, from order of C. P. Lawrence Co., Sept. T., 1908, No. 13, dismissing petition to limit and define curtilage in case of Harry M. Wirsing v. Pennsylvania Hotel & Sanitarium Company, Owner or Reputed Owner. Petition to limit and define curtilage. Before Porter, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts of the case. Error assigned was order dismissing the petition.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Brown,
On June 12, 1906, Harry M. Wirsing, the appellee, filed a mechanic’s lien against a building and two lots of ground, naming the Pennsylvania Hotel & Sanitarium Company as owner or reputed owner. He obtained a judgment on this lien on June 3, 1908, and on March 3, 1909, the South Side Trust Company, trustee in bankruptcy of the Pulaski Springs Hotel Company, successor in title to the Pennsylvania Hotel & Sanitarium Company, presented a petition to the court below, praying for an order limiting and defining the curtilage bound by the appellee’s mechanic’s lien and…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Anselmo v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Sumption v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Charch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Dietz v. BartellWashington Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.