Lively v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MANSFIELD Judge,
delivered the opinion of the Court,
in which McCORMICK, Presiding Judge, and KELLER, PRICE, HOLLAND and WOMACK, Judges, joined.
We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Fourth Court of Appeals had erred in holding that the trial court had not violated appellant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.1 We hold now that the Fourth Court of Appeals did not err.
The Relevant Facts
In May 1995 the Kimble County Grand Jury indicted appellant for the felony offenses of indecency with a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Lively v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
3Cited by36 opinions
- Marx v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Edwards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Mitchell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- In Re Kellogg-Brown & Root, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.