Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter E. Brewer and Brian E. Honel

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1993No. 92-5038, 92-5043PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

In these consolidated cases, Defendants Walter E. Brewer and Brian E. Honel appeal the district court’s order of restitution following Defendants’ guilty plea to conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Defendants contend that the district court erred in ordering them to pay restitution for losses not caused by their specific conduct. Defendants further contend that the district court used unreliable information to calculate the total loss, making its finding of loss clearly erroneous.' We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we affirm.

Defendants managed discount…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. David Lanzotti and Connie L. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Paul Frederick LaneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Dennis Leo LowderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Edward P. ReddeckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API