Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance & Pearce
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur D. Spatt, J.
This is a petition by Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential) for a stay of arbitration of an uninsured motorist’s claim arising from an automobile accident which occurred on October 13,1982. In this occurrence, a vehicle owned by Judith Meat Market, Inc. (Judith), and operated by one Roberto Felipe struck the rear of a vehicle owned by one Thomas Pearce. The Pearce vehicle was insured by the petitioner.
In this accident, claimant Jerome Pearce was a passenger in the Pearce vehicle and sustained personal injuries. Claimant Pearce…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ming v. . CorbinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. O'ConnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Donley v. . Glens Falls Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- American Surety Co. v. RosenthalNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Rogers v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Garcia v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017