Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 29, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The archway into which the plaintiff fell was in the front wall of a brick block which was built up to and formed the line of the highway. It was about three feet wide and three or four feet high, and served as an entrance to steps leading down to an arched and covered passageway which ran through the block. No part of the steps, archway, or passageway was within the limits of the highway, except “ a portion of the steps which did not come above the surface, but were covered *146by planking, making the street at that point even and regular with the rest of the highway and of the proper width.’’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beardsley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
  2. Spellman v. Inhabitants of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Damon v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Marshall V. Inhabitants of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Fortin v. Inhabitants of EasthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunnewell v. HaskellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. City of Birmingham v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Scannal v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Spillane v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Shea v. Inhabitants of WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API