Legal Opinion
Cassens v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 1, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
— The writ of error brings for review a judgment entered in favor of the defendant on demurrer to amend declaration sustained.
The amended declaration was based on the obligation contained in an insurance policy in the following language;
“Under the terms of the Group Policy mentioned on page One of this certificate, an Employee shall be considered totally and permanently disabled who furnishes due proof to the Company that, while insured thereunder and prior to his 60th birthday, he has become so disabled, as a re'sult of bodily injury or disease, as to be prevented permanently from engaging…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Hawkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. NoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- New York Life Insurance v. LecksSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. WigginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Richards v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Stossell v. Gulf Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.