Crossan v. May
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Blackford Ch’cuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
The appellee, May, as the endorsee of Ransom & Bro., brought this action against James W. Powell, James M. Powell, Elliott Crossan and John .McGeath, upon a promissory note purporting to have been executed "by the persons above named as defendants. The note was payable to “Ransom & Bro. or order, at their office in Hartford City, Indiana,” and it was averred in the complaint that “said office was a regular banking office, doing a banking business under the banking law of the State of Indiana.”
The two Powells made default. Crossan and McGeath each answered separately, stating that each signed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Bingham v. KimballIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Davidson v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Gordon v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Jones v. DorrIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Bridges v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Hardy v. BrierIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Favorite v. StidhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Renfro Bros. v. Merchants & Mechanics' BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.