Legal Opinion

Crossan v. May

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Blackford Ch’cuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

The appellee, May, as the endorsee of Ransom & Bro., brought this action against James W. Powell, James M. Powell, Elliott Crossan and John .McGeath, upon a promissory note purporting to have been executed "by the persons above named as defendants. The note was payable to “Ransom & Bro. or order, at their office in Hartford City, Indiana,” and it was averred in the complaint that “said office was a regular banking office, doing a banking business under the banking law of the State of Indiana.”

The two Powells made default. Crossan and McGeath each answered separately, stating that each signed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Bingham v. KimballIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Davidson v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Gordon v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Jones v. DorrIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Bridges v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hardy v. BrierIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Favorite v. StidhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Renfro Bros. v. Merchants & Mechanics' BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API