Legal Opinion
Robine v. Apco, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge:
This is an action involving two causes of action, (1) breach of confidence by im proper use of trade secrets, and (2) patent infringement. Trial was demanded before a jury on both issues. Trial was begun before a jury because certain of the relief requested in the complaint was legal in nature. Robine v. Ryan, 310 F.2d 797 (2d Cir. 1962). See, Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469, 82 S.Ct. 894, 8 L.Ed.2d 44 (1962).
THE FACTS
The plaintiffs, Paul Robine and Walter C. Lambert, were two young engineers working for the Ford Motor Company in Detroit. In the latter 1940s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Aerovox Corporation v. Polymet Mfg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- A. Schrader's Sons v. Wein Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Felmlee v. LockettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Skippy, Inc. v. Cpc International, Inc., Skippy, Inc. v. Cpc International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- AH Emery Company v. Marcan Products CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.