Legal Opinion

In Re Ryan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 24, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Respondent stands convicted of having embezzled substantial sums of money belonging to clients. He has also admitted forging his clients’ signatures by way of endorsement upon one or more checks and drawing a check upon his trustee account knowing that it would not be honored because of insufficient funds resulting from his own misappropriations.

Such conduct is of so reprehensible a nature as to permit of only one form of discipline.

It is the order of the Court that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

For disbarment—Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re BeckmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. In re StrogerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API