Legal Opinion
Radunz v. Muhlhausen
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 13, 2010No. 09-2869PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Randall Radunz, a former Wisconsin inmate, claims in this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that the sheriff of Pierce County, Wisconsin, and three of the sheriffs subordinates jailed him unlawfully on a motion to revoke his probation and then denied him necessary medical care while he was in their custody. The district court dismissed the suit on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim that these defendants violated Radunz’s rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); Fed. R.CivP. 8(a); DeWalt v. Carter, 224 F.3d 607, 611 (7th…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lantz v. Office of the Jackson Township TrusteeDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
- Stanton v. AramarkDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022