Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. City of Portland

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 5, 2021No. 3:19-cv-01126Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MARK DICKERSON, Case No. 3:19-cv-01126-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CITY OF PORTLAND; MULTNOMAH COUNTY; MATT JACOBSEN; and JOHN DOES 1-15, Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Mark Dickerson (“Dickerson”), a self-represented litigant, filed this action against the City of Portland (the “City”), Multnomah County (the “County”), John Does 1-15, and Portland Police Bureau Officer Matt Jacobsen (“Officer Jacobsen”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Dickerson brought claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(“Section 1983”) for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Save Our Valley v. Sound TransitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Maria Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. John Draper v. D. RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API