Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Bailey v. Parole Bd. (Slip Opinions)
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 2017No. 2017-0090PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
*435 *426 {¶ 1} Appellants, Michael Bailey, Steven Schmitz, William Morehouse, Benjamin Hudach, and Jeffrey Holland ("the inmates"), appeal the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals dismissing their complaint against the Ohio Parole Board ("the board") seeking a writ of mandamus. We affirm the court of appeals' judgment.
Background
{¶ 2} On September 23, 2015, the inmates filed in the court of appeals an original action against the board, seeking a writ of mandamus. At the time, all five were incarcerated in state detention facilities and were "old law" offenders. An old-law offender is an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. RatliffOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. EatonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. CochranOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. JoyceOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.