Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
{¶ 1} The Ohio Adult Parole Authority (“APA”) adopted new parole guidelines on March 1, 1998. According to the APA, the revised guidelines were intended to “promote a more consistent exercise of discretion, and enable fairer and more equitable decision-making” without removing the opportunity for consideration of parole eligibility on an individual case basis.
{¶ 2} The APA’s new guidelines set forth a “parole guidelines chart” to determine the range of time that a prisoner should serve before being released. When considering inmates for parole the APA relies on a combination of two factors:…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Lipschutz v. Shoemaker, Director, Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hemphill v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Michael v. GheeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- State ex rel. Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.