Higgins v. Simmons
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
The issue underlying this appeal is whether the bank’s loan officer trainee was an agent for the purpose of serving attachment papers upon the garnishee bank in accordance with N.C.G.S. § 1-440.26. Based upon a straightforward reading of this statute as applied to the facts in this case, we find that the loan officer was the bank’s agent and therefore the bank was properly served.
Plaintiff filed a complaint 14 January 1983, alleging a debt of $4,200 owed to him by defendant. Attachment proceedings were initiated concurrently, culminating in the service three days later of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Plemmer v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Copland v. Wireless Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Williams v. HabulCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Cross v. Capital Transaction Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Cook v. Union Zoning Bd. of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- TOWN OF MIDLAND v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.