Legal Opinion

McEntyre v. First Nat. Bank of Headland

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1937No. 4 Div. 276PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The action was in statutory form, with statutory bonds claiming one two-horse Mitchell wagon and harness and one bay mare mule, or red colored mare. mule,, named Ella (Maud). The plea was non detinet, which admitted the possession.

On the trial, and after hearing the evidence and the charge of the court, the. jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. Whereupon, the plaintiff made a motion for a new. trial on the grounds (1) that the verdict was contrary to law, and (2) that the verdict was contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

' In order to authorize a recovery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Hicks v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  3. Hall v. PageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  4. Peck v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Black Mercantile Co. v. AyersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Thornton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Birmingham Electric Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Chambers v. CulverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API