Legal Opinion
Bailey, III v. Jezierski
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 26, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00085Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION HOWARD A BAILEY, III, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:23-CV-85 JD ERIC JEZIERSKI, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are two motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint. Defendants Daniel Byrd and Eric Jezierski (the “Officer Defendants”) have filed a partial motion to dismiss. (DE 9.) Defendant Leslie Baker has filed a separate motion to dismiss seeking to dismiss all claims against her. (DE 14.) For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant in part the Officer Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.