Legal Opinion
Hines v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided May 19, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 4845PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.
Defendant, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, has filed a motion *696in accordance with Rule 50(b) F.R. Civ.P. to set aside the verdict of the jury and for a judgment in its favor upon the ground that all of the evidence showed that the insured died as a result of suicide rather than accident.
Defendant has also moved for a new trial and urged in its support seven grounds. The first two grounds are directed to the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury. Grounds 3 and 4 assert that the Court erred in not sustaining defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Werthan Bag Corp. v. Agnew. Agnew v. Werthan Bag CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Bryan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Bryan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tsangarakis v. Panama Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Tsangarakis v. Panama Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968