Legal Opinion

Von Schmidt v. Huntington

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1850PublishedCited by 24 opinions

This was an appeal from a decree of the court of First Instance of the district of San Francisco. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. The cause was argued in this court by

1Opinion of the Court

*57 By the Court,

Benotstt, J.

The parties to this suit, plaintiffs and defendants, in conjunction with others, formed, a company in the city of Tfew York, in the early part of the year 1849, under the name of the Yew York Union Mining Company. Articles of association were adopted, which declare that the persons whose names are subscribed thereto, agree to associate themselves for the purpose of prosecuting the business of mining in California, from the 1st day of January, 1849, until the 1st day of October, 1853 ; and that the company shall consist of not less than twenty-nine operative or…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Bingham v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API