Legal Opinion

Samson v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided June 29, 2012No. Case No. 2:11-cv-6-UA-DNFPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM TERRELL HODGES, District Judge.

Plaintiff Richard Samson has filed claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (“ADA”) and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. (“FCRA”) against Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“Fed Ex”), alleging that Fed Ex revoked an offer of employment upon discovery that Mr. Samson has Type-I, insulin-dependent diabetes. Fed Ex has filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims (Doc. 55), and Mr. Samson has filed a response in opposition (Doc. 61).

Upon due consideration, and for the reasons that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Holly v. Clairson Industries, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard Samson v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Overstreet v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
  3. Richard Samson v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API