Big Table, Inc. v. Schroeder
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
The dispositive question in this action is whether the magazine “Big Table I” is obscene, but a necessary preliminary to that inquiry, as it is raised here, is a resolution of whether the judicial review of a Post Office order, barring matter from the mails on such ground, is subject to and adequately provided for by the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009. That issue is implicit in the clash between the opposing motions for summary judgment which are before the court for its consideration.
The plaintiff, an Illinois corporation, is the publisher…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.