Legal Opinion
United States v. Mack F. Flynn, AKA Maxie Flynn
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 25, 2002No. 01-7065PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Mack F. Flynn pled guilty conditionally to violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 924(c), 1952(a)(3), and 922(n). He reserved his right to appeal “any and all adverse rulings, specifically the [ ] denial of his Motion to Suppress.” ApltApp. at 43. On appeal, he contends the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and also argues there was insufficient evidence that the firearm found in his car was carried “during and in relation to” the underlying crime as required by section 924(c). We affirm.
I
On the afternoon of October 3,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Smith v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Carless Jones and Eugene HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Duvalier Antonio DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Roth v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. RuizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. EasleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. DennyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.