Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 5, 1915No. 6180PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Indictment for sale of liquor; from city court of Valdosta— Judge Cranford. November 14, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBboyles, J.

1. Jurors should come to the consideration of a case (especially when it is a criminal one) free from even a suspicion of prejudgment or fixed opinion upon any material fact in the issue to be tried, — as to the parties, the subject-matter, or the credibility of the witnesses. Upon a showing, made on a principal challenge for cause, that certain named jurors had served at the same term of the court on other juries, which had convicted other defendants of the same offense, in cases involving the same transaction, and where it appeared, from the testimony of State’s counsel, that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Georgia Railroad v. ColeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Redfearn v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. McKay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lingerfelt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Bowens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Edwards v. GrinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Ellison v. National By-Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API