Legal Opinion
Myung Sook Choe v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1995No. 93-70590Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
69 F.3d 543
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Myung Sook CHOE, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 93-70590.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 9, 1995.*
Decided Oct. 31, 1995.
Before: BROWNING, D.W. NELSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sang Chul Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Nazario Castaneda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Severiano Vasquez-Mondragon v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Victor Manuel Pena-Urrutia v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981