Legal Opinion

Maryland Transit Administration v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 6, 2005No. CIV. AMD 04-3650, CIV. AMD 04-3683, CIV. AMD 05-403PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVIS, District Judge.

These three cases arise out of a pair of arbitration proceedings between the parties, Maryland Transit Administration (“MTA”) and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“AMTRAK”). Two distinct arbitration awards are at issue. In the first award, a majority of the arbitration panel ruled in favor of MTA, and concluded that a train collision near the Baltimore train station was the fault, i.e., resulted from gross negligence, of an AMTRAK locomotive engineer. In case number AMD 04-3683, MTA seeks confirmation of that award pursuant to the Federal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. In re Pegasus Gold Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Apex Plumbing Supply, Incorporated Harold Falchick v. U.S. Supply Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. FIA Card Services, N.A. v. GachienguDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  2. General Elec. Co. v. Anson Stamping Co. Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
  3. Walker v. National RR Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  4. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC v. WattsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
  5. Balch v. Oracle CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API