Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Master Builders, Inc. v. Cabbell

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1980No. 4387Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

I concur in the result.

The trial court made the following pertinent findings of fact:

4. Jim Cabbell Agency is a licensed New Mexico real estate agency and James W. Cabbell, Sr., is a licensed New Mexico real estate broker who is employed by Jim Cabbell Agency.

6. On February 27, 1976, Pioneer Development, Inc., entered into a written real estate sales agreement with Master Builders, Inc., whereby Master Builders, Inc. agreed to buy the land described

7. The said written sales agreement . . . also provided:

A. That Jim Cabbell Agency was given an exclusive agency with the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Michigan Chandelier Co. v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Morris v. GoldthorpIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API