Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 25, 1966No. Civ. A. 1066-65PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
Federal income taxpayers, husband and wife, have filed their verified petition in this Court seeking a return of what they denominate “evidence illegally taken from the petitioners. * * * ” They invoke this Court’s jurisdiction in equity, and seek relief by mandatory injunction for the return of the evidentiary material, and to prevent respondent United States Attorney from presenting the evidence so secured to a Federal Grand Jury for the purpose of securing a criminal indictment. On October 1, 1965 the Court ordered that the respondents Show Cause why the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jacob J. Frohmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. JaskiewiczDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- O'Connor v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
- United States v. BachmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- United States v. Morton Provision Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.