Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 2009No. 2344 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Lonnie Mitchell, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on July 15, 2008, after he was adjudged guilty of harassment and found in indirect criminal contempt for violating a protection from abuse (“PFA”) order. Appellant’s counsel has filed a petition to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Commonwealth v. McClendon, 495 Pa. 467, 434 A.2d 1185 (1981). For the reasons that follow, we deny counsel’s petition to withdraw, vacate the judgment of sentence with respect to Appellant’s harassment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. GoodwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PostieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Com v. Brooks, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. Adewumi, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Adorno, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. v. Anderson, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API