Legal Opinion
Griffith v. Educap Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 10, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2016-1541Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATASHA GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-cv-1541 (DLF) EDUCAP INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Natasha Griffith, asserts several claims against EduCap Inc., Weinstock, Friedman & Friedman, P.A., and HSBC Bank U.S.A., N.A. Before the Court is EduCap and Weinstock’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and HSBC’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants in part and denies in part EduCap and Weinstock’s Motion to Dismiss and grants HSBC’s Motion for Judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Gerry Scott v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- In Re YamashitaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bussineau v. President of Georgetown CollegeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.