Legal Opinion

Irving-Pitt Mfg. Co. v. Blackwell-Wielandy Book & Stationery Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1916No. 4681PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Suit in equity by the Irving-Pitt Manufacturing • Company against the Blackwell-Wielandy Book & Stationery Company. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

The complainant, the Irving-Pitt Manufacturing Company, a corporation, is the owner of letters patent No. 778,070 granted December 20, 1904, to the Irving-Pitt Manufacturing Company of Kansas City, Mo., a copartnership, assignee of William P. Pitt for an improvement in loose-leaf books. In Irving-Pitt Manufacturing Co. v. Twinlock Co. (McMillan Book Company, intervener) 220 Fed. 325, in the District Court for the Southern District of New York presided over by Judge Rose of Maryland, it was determined that this patent was valid. This case was affirmed on appeal on the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Lemley v. Dobson-Evans Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Stoody Co. v. Osage Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  4. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Wotoshaver, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API