Willoughby v. Chicago Junction Railways & Union Stock Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On rule to show cause why an injunction should not issue. Heard on bill, supplemental bill, answers and affidavits, and on subsequent stipulation that the cause should be disposed of as having been heard on final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
Green, V. C.
For convenience, the designations of the respective parties used by counsel are herein adopted, as follows:
The Chicago Junction Railways and Union Stockyards Company, as “ The New Jersey Company.”
The Union Stockyard and Transit Company of Chicago, as “ The Chicago Company.”
Armour & Company, Nelson Morris & Company and Swift & Company, as “-The Associate Packers; ” other parties located and operating their plants in the vicinity of the stockyards of the Chicago Company, as “ The Non-Associate Packers.”
*658The original bill was filed December 17th, 1891, by Charles L. Willoughby, on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Emery v. FowlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
- Pennsylvania Co. v. EllettIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- New York & Chicago Grain & Stock Exchange v. Board of Trade of the City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Solimine v. HollanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. ReevesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Slutzker v. RieberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Holub v. JacobwitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.