Legal Opinion

Moss v. Metropolitan National Bank of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1976No. 16616PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan National Bank on its suit on two promissory notes. Defendants Phil P. Moss and Arthur Moss had filed a defensive pleading alleging usury.

We review the bank’s petition. It states that on or about July 26, 1974, Phil P. Moss executed and delivered to appellee a promissory note for $30,000 bearing ten per cent interest. It was due on demand or, if no demand was made, on or before October 19, 1975, and provided that it was to be reduced every ninety days by payment of $6,000 plus accrued interest. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kuper v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Richards v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Armando Fong Najarro and Compania Financiera Libano, S.A. v. Sasi International, Ltd., and Suzanne FrameCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Greenway Bank & Trust of Houston v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  4. Stephens v. First Bank and Trust of RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Bradley v. Houston State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API