Legal Opinion

State v. Gibson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Ve have here for decision (1) the validity of the indictment, (2) the competency of evidence, (3) the propriety of a colloquy between court and counsel, and (4) the legality of suspended sentences.

I. The Validity of the Indictment.

The defendants have pressed their motion for quashal of the indictment with conviction and apparent confidence. They seem assured that it offends the rule against duplicity or multifariousness in a single bill, and that in the first and fourth counts, two separate and distinct offenses are joined without naming the defendants in respect of the second alleged…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API