Legal Opinion

Oberhelman v. Barnes Investment Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 30, 1984No. 56,332PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

This is an action brought by a minority shareholder of a close corporation on his own behalf and as a stockholder’s derivative action on behalf of the corporation. Plaintiff, Homer H. Oberhelman, seeks to recover the principal and interest on loans Barnes Investment Corporation (Barnes, or the corporation) made to defendant Arthur M. Nease, Jr., who is the majority shareholder, president, and chairman of the Board of Directors. Plaintiff also sought punitive damages. The trial court entered judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals.

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Newton v. Hornblower, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Johnston v. GreeneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
  3. Wolf v. BrungardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Blazer v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. Parsons Mobile Products., Inc. v. RemmertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Nash Oil & Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Jon A. CAMP, Appellant, v. Robert J. DEMA, James R. Millwee, Alexander Mitchell, and James Kidder, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  5. Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API