Legal Opinion

United States v. Subir Chaklader

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 10, 1993No. 92-1818PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Subir Chaklader was ordered by the district court to serve a previously suspended five-year sentence for violating the conditions of his parole by committing an assault and battery with a deadly weapon in California. On appeal, Chaklader argues that the twenty-one-month delay between the time that California prison officials first indicated that he would be made available to federal authorities on a detain-er and the commencement of federal probation revocation proceedings, violated Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the due process clause of the United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Alfred ArgentineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Gary Lee WickhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Gregory SackingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Pagán-RodríguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. López-LópezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Lopez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Cosme OidacCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API