United States v. Cosme Oidac
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.
Cosme Oidac appeals the District Court’s imposition of a 24-month sentence for having violated the terms of his supervised release. Oidac contends that his due process rights were violated by the District Court’s delay in holding the revocation hearing, and that the sentence was based on a factual error and thus procedurally unreasonable. We will affirm.
I
On February 5, 1992, Oidac was indicted for offenses related to cocaine trafficking, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and 860(a). In proceedings before the Honorable Judge Jan…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BURNO v. WETZELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- BURNO v. WETZELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019