Hostetter v. Fries
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
The motion for a preliminary injunction must be denied, because it does not appear from tho bill and affidavits that defendants are infringing the complainant’s trade-mark. Complainants’ property consists in the right to uso the name “Dr. J. Ilostetter’s Stomach Bitters” in connection with certain labels, bottles, and other devices, which designate the preparation as of their own manufacture, and indicate its origin.. The bill alleges that the defendants are engaged inmamifacturing and selling certain essences, oils, and extracts which they represent can bo so manipulated and used as to…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hostetter v. VowinkleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1871
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Wm. R. Warner & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Lindner Co. v. Myrod Shoe Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Searle & Hereth Co. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
- Brooten v. Oregon Kelp Ore Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.