Legal Opinion

Nanal, Inc. v. SMK International, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided December 27, 2021No. 2:19-cv-02211Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 7 NANAL, INC., Case No. 2:19-cv-02211-RFB-EJY 8 9 Plaintiff, ORDER 10 v. 11 12 SMK INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al, 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF Nos. 75, 19 76, Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 81, and Plaintiff’s Motion to Shorten 20 Time on Setting a Hearing, ECF No. 87. For the reasons stated below, the motions are DENIED. 21 22 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 23 On December 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint. ECF No. 1. On…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Luz M. SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API