Legal Opinion
United States v. Gary Beuckelaere
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1996No. 95-1267PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtContie, J., joined by Cole, J.,
SUHRHEINRICH, J. (pp. 787-88), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
CONTIE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Gary Beuckelaere, appeals the judgment entered after his guilty plea to possession of a machinegun in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), which he alleges is unconstitutional. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the district court.
I
On September 15, 1994, a single-count indictment was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, charging defendant with possession of a machinegun on February 22, 1994, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Rybar, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Robert Franklyn, Also Known as Robert Franklin, and Ralph Gonzalez, Also Known as Raphael QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. William Joseph KirkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Steven Scott KnutsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.