Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Grenci

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 2009No. A-104 September Term 2007Published

1DissentJustice Rivera-Soto

On June 9, 2003, defendant Angelo A. Grenci appeared at a pretrial conference concerning a then pending indictment in which he was charged with one count of second-degree burglary, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:18-2. During a later motion for a new trial, the trial court found as a fact that, at the June 9, 2003 pretrial conference,

[i]t’s not disputed by [defendant] and the Defense that [defendant] knew that the superseding indictment was coming____

[T]he assistant prosecutor ... gave notice to defense counsel that [the State] would be seeking a superseding indictment which would be returned on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. State v. ReldanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  4. State v. MahoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. State v. MahoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API