Legal Opinion

Kimmons v. Heldt

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1983No. 6254PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

Before BURKE, C.J., RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ., and MOODY, Judge.* COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from a child custody dispute between Appellant Gabriele Kim-mons and Appellee Rolf Heldt. The Alaska Superior Court dismissed Kimmons’ proceeding on the basis that California was already exercising jurisdiction over the dispute in a proceeding commenced by Heldt. The court subsequently ordered recognition of the California decree awarding physical custody of the parties’ child to Heldt. The court also awarded full attorney’s fees to Heldt. From these determinations,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rexford v. RexfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Szmyd v. SzmydAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pinneo v. PinneoAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bock v. BockAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jones v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Murphy v. DanforthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Bliss v. BlissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API