Legal Opinion

Miller v. Weinberger

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 14, 1973No. Civ. A. 2954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action for judicial review of the decision of the defendant administrator, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), denying the plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423. Both parties have moved for a summary judgment, Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and agree that the sole issue for determination is whether the Secretary’s final decision that the plaintiff was not entitled to disability benefits or to a period of disability as of March 31, 1963, the date on which she last met…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charles Luttrell Combs v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  2. Valborg Berven v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Wilfred Sangster v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. Wanda C. Harrison v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. Murphy v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Selig v. RichardsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  2. Flores v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1977
  3. Hill v. CalifanoDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
  4. Meza v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API