Legal Opinion

Hill v. Califano

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided October 14, 1977No. CIV-4-77-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action for the judicial review of the final decision of the defendant Secretary, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), denying the plain*76tiff’s claim for disability health insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423. The defendant moved for a judgment on the pleadings. Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff moved for a summary judgment. Rule 56(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff filed an application for such benefits on August 8, 1975, alleging that he first became unable to engage in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. William T. Miracle v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  5. Christine Lemaster v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fields v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API