Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Kietzman v. Bethany Circle of King's Daughters of Madison, Ind., Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 30, 2018No. 4:16–cv–00009–SEB–DMLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Counts I and II of the complaint are qui tam claims brought by Kietzman on behalf of the United States. Count I charges presentment of false or fraudulent claims in violation of the FCA; Count II charges conspiracy to commit the same. Counts III and IV are claims filed by Kietzman personally, respectively charging wrongful and retaliatory discharge under state law and under the FCA. Bethany Circle attacks the three federal claims as insufficiently pleaded and urges us to relinquish jurisdiction over the state claim.

Standard of Decision

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) requires "a short and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. The Kroger Co., Kroger Limited Partnership I, KRGP, Inc., Payless Super Markets, Inc., and Ralphs Grocery CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Hubert v. Board of Education of the City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Jennifer S. Jones v. Parkview Health System Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API