Legal Opinion

Petty Investment Co. v. Miller

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1978No. 15186PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim for attorney’s fees. The claim arises from services rendered by plaintiff’s attorney in seeking to have a lien declared invalid. We reverse and remand fqr the award of attorney’s fees. No costs awarded. All statutory references are to Utah Code Annotated, 1953.

Plaintiff, Petty Investment Company, brought an action in district court against Melvin Miller, doing business as Miller Sales. Petty claimed, (1) a lien recorded by Miller was invalid as against Petty, (2) Petty was entitled to damages pursuant to 38-1-24,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palombi v. D & C BUILDERSUtah Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AAA Fencing Co. v. Raintree Development & Energy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. First General Services v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  3. Rotta v. HawkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Humana, Inc. v. NguyenNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API