Weinstein v. Sanborn

[¶ 1] Neal Weinstein appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Warren, I.), entered after a non-jury trial, finding that he had failed to establish title to property abutting his lot by adverse possession, acquiescence, or parol agreement. Contrary to Weinstein’s contentions, the trial court did not err when it determined that he failed to satisfy his burden of proof on all of these theories. See Stowell v. Swift, 576 A.2d 204, 205 (Me.1990); Calthorpe v. Abrahamson, 441 A.2d 284, 289 (Me.1982); Steinherz v. Wilson, 1998 ME 22, ¶ 12, 705 A.2d 710, 713.

[¶ 2] Additionally,…