Legal Opinion

Oakman v. Department of Corrections

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2006PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Before this Court is a pro se petition for review in the nature of mandamus filed in our original jurisdiction by inmate Luke Oakman (Oakman) requesting this Court to order the Department of Corrections (Department) to credit him for time served on his original split sentence.

This matter was previously before the Court when Oakman filed his pro se petition to which the Department filed preliminary objections. To briefly recap the facts in that matter, Oakman was and still remains incarcerated in the State Correctional Institution at Albion (SCI-Albion) for a 1984…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Abraham v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Aviles v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Black v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HerediaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. PAYNE v. KERNSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Hoyt v. Pa. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Evans v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Sammons v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API